HIV Does Not Cause AIDS

Alright ... it saddened me that many of you chose not to watch that video about the hideous, behind-the-scenes dealings of the American government. But hopefully you will read this ...

An amazing trial is going on currently in Australia over whether HIV is the cause of AIDS. This lawsuit, initiated by the Perth group, a conglomeration of scientists who question the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Called to the stand in the last week is the fucktard who started this mess back in 1984, Dr. Robert Gallo.

I am going to give you the entire email I received, which details the trial:

HIV on Trial in Australia:Court Weighs Evidence for Claims of Isolation, Transmission and Testing

A motion for appeal in a criminal hearing in Adelaide, Australia has become thefocus of international attention as fundamental claims by orthodox AIDSresearchers -- including the infamous Dr Robert Gallo -- come under vigorouscross-examination by an attorney demanding scientific evidence that the virusexists. Top AIDS industry spokespersons from around the world have appeared inperson or by satellite in Adelaide to defend the HIV hypothesis against chargesby a local team of scientific and medical experts known as "The Perth Group"(http://www.ThePerthGroup.com <http://www.ThePerthGroup.com> ) who asserts thattwo decades of AIDS research have failed to produce a purified isolate of HIV,validation of the accuracy so-called HIV tests, or proof that HIV is transmittedthrough bodily fluids.

Below are two news articles about the legal proceedings. Other information aboutthe trial and actual transcripts of testimony can be found at http://aras.ab.ca<http://aras.ab.ca> /index.php

For this week's testimony by alleged HIV discoverer Dr Robert Gallo, go directly to http://aras.ab.ca/articles/legal/Gallo-Transcript.pdf

Michael Geiger, a close observer of the events in Adelaide, reports being"stunned and amazed" by Gallo's statements to the court. Geiger says, "It'sdifficult to tell if Gallo was defending HIV or if his testimony is a publicadmission of guilt."

Geiger urges transcript readers to note:

- Page 1294 where Gallo agrees that he found evidence of HIV in only 40% of theAIDS patients in his original study, and that 40% is not enough to prove HIV isthe cause of AIDS:

Attorney to Gallo: "You had 48 out of 119, or 40%?

Gallo: "I agree"

Attorney: "Do you agree that the isolation of HIV from only 40% of patients isnot proof that HIV causes AIDS?"

Gallo: "I would say of course, in and of itself, 40% isolation of a new virus, Iwould not say is the cause."

- Page 1"00 where Gallo admits to finding low percentages of HIV positivity inpeople with AIDS symptoms:

Attorney: "For adults with KS, 30%; for adultswith AIDS opportunistic infections47%. Do you accept your figures?"

Gallo: "I accept the figures."

- Page 1317 where Gallo acknowledges finding no HIV in KS lesions or in T cells,and testimony on page 1318 in which Gallo admits that "viral load" tests cannotbe used to prove infection with a virus.

The language in news articles covering the Adelaide trial speaks loudly andclearly of media prejudice in AIDS reporting. In the first of the two pieces that follow, medical and scientific experts challenging the notion that HIV has been isolated according to proper, scientific standards are branded "anorganized group of HIV deniers" and lack official titles such as MD, while thosebeing called by the court to produce evidence are referred to as "experts" withrepeated references to their professional credentials.

The obvious bent of Australian coverage is at least one step up from the USmedia response: Not a single story on the uproar from down under has appeared in American news.

TELL EVERYONE!!!!!