Saturday, February 24, 2007

Cameron's Jesus a Titanic Fraud

(Originally published on The Rec )

Strap yourselves in, kids. It looks like we're in for the first huge firestorm of the year.

James Cameron, who recently announced his new science fiction film "Avatar" will arrive in theaters in May of 2009, has suddenly decided to jeopardize the film with a publicity stunt of titanic proportions.

He claims to have found the body of Jesus.

Time Magazine is running a story that describes what Cameron plans to show the world at a Monday press conference: the coffins of Jesus, his mother Mary, and Mary Magdelene.

Wooooo, boy. How long before one of the God-fearin' Christians puts a bullet of Love in his head?

A 90-minute documentary will air on several stations around the world, including the Discovery Channel, which will lay out the evidence that not only was Jesus not resurrected from his grave, but that he also sired a son with Mary Magdelene. Here is an excerpt from that report about the discovery:

Let's go back 27 years, when Israeli construction workers were gouging out the foundations for a new building in the industrial park in the Talpiyot, a Jerusalem suburb. of Jerusalem. The earth gave way, revealing a 2,000 year old cave with 10 stone caskets. Archologists were summoned, and the stone caskets carted away for examination. It took 20 years for experts to decipher the names on the ten tombs. They were: Jesua, son of Joseph, Mary, Mary, Mathew, Jofa and Judah, son of Jesua.

This is going to cause a huge controversy, the likes of which we have not seen in some time. Cameron would be better off getting into the director's chair and trying to keep his ego-fueled mouth shut. Something like this will get you killed in the red states, and probably in the blue, too.

Meanwhile, no word from Mel Gibson on his thoughts about this discovery. No doubt he is sharpening the points on his mace even as we speak.

13 Comments:

At 2:55 AM, Blogger Me said...

Meanwhile, no word from Mel Gibson on his thoughts about this discovery.

Says it all, really.

I will certenly be waiting for this trainwreck to hit the cable networks.

 
At 7:39 AM, Blogger Woozie said...

Good, I'm glad he's sharpening them points. I'll hold Cameron down for him. Why would Jesus, a dude who was put to death by the Roman Empire, be buried in a tomb? They probably just tossed him in a ditch, something tells me the government wouldn't spend its time or money burying a criminal in a damn tomb.

 
At 2:56 PM, Blogger ryk said...

hee-hee, watch while I poke this hornet's nest with a stick.

 
At 3:01 PM, Blogger sammyray said...

Wooz ... perhaps you're not up on your history. The Bible clearly states that the folowers of Jesus took his body and laid it in a tomb.

As was Jewish custom, the bodies were left in a tomb for one year to decompose, and then their bones were moved and placed into an ossuary.

This tomb contained ten ossuaries, one of which had the inscription Jesus son of Joseph.

 
At 4:22 PM, Blogger Woozie said...

The words "history" and "bible" do not belong in the same paragraph.

 
At 6:13 PM, Blogger sammyray said...

@ Wooz: Actually historical and archeological evidence seems to corroborate much of what the Bible says about ancient events. Well, maybe not so much the giant flood and stuff ... but things like the Israelites leaving Egypt en masse, etc.

 
At 9:34 AM, Blogger Pixie said...

I would laugh my ass off if it was him, you never know perhaps he will turn out to be the father of Anna Nicoles baby too...

 
At 1:27 PM, Blogger Woozie said...

archeological evidence

Like that of some nutcase director who thinks he found Jesus, despite overwhelming odds against him?

Do you really think the Romans would have given Jesus' body back to his family? This is not the U.S. we're talking about, this is ancient Rome.

 
At 1:39 PM, Blogger sammyray said...

@ Wooz: The Romans didn't care about Jesus one way or another. He barely made a dent in their society; it would be like a man being concerned with an ant. All available historical evidence points to the Jews wanting him dead, and the Romans simply appeasing them.

As far as his body, what would they really care about giving it back to his mother and friends? It's one less thing they need to do.

The point is, THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT JESUS.

There is no doubt that a man named Jesus walked the earth around that time, and he amassed a few followers who created a stir in the decades following his death. Whether he was just a charismatic speaker or the Son of God is open to conjecture, since there is precious little evidence either way.

But the PROBABILITY is that his human body, once dead by whatever means, was buried SOMEWHERE. It would have likely been buried with his family, and his children - if he had any - would have been buried with him.

As far as your mockery of archeological evidence, you should really do more research. Things such as the water tunnel of Hezekiah, or the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, or the Isrealite exodus from Egypt, have been corroborated by archaeological evidence by SECULAR sources, not Biblical.

 
At 6:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jesus could come down from th e clouds tomorrow and say, "Dude's it was all just a joke. And all these fundamentalists speaking for me have totally misrepresented everything I really stand for."

He could do that from on high and he'd be denied and likely crucified again by the very same fundamentalists who claim to love him.

The point being that Christ is Big Business and there's a big financial interest in keeping him "alive."

People are so obsessed with the physical body and the legend that they've long ago dismissed his message.

But you're right, Sammyray, if this isn't a can of worms I don't know what is.

 
At 12:17 PM, Blogger Woozie said...

Well god damn, excuse me, let me know when I'm allowed back okay?

 
At 12:28 PM, Blogger Woozie said...

I'm used what I knew to draw a conclusion. Did I ever present this conclusion as absolute fact? No. I said I didn't believe that Jesus was ever buried anywhere, using what I knew. I'm not claiming to have all the damn answers, okay? A lack of knowledge does not, repeat--does not, qualify as a mockery. And do you know what? I'm not going to waste my time meticulously digging through every piece of archaeological evidence ever amassed about Jesus Christ to prove whether or not the Romans gave him back or tossed him in a ditch, because I have neither the time nor the patience to do so.

 
At 6:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Joseph of Arimethea was a wealthy man, and he made his own family tomb a sanctuary for the body of Christ.

In those days, government didn't take responsibility for everything. Stuff like dealing with the body was left up to the family, friends, community, or nature.

In the case of Jesus Christ, it was a clear case of government thugs killing according to the orders of their minions.

The plotters even managed to stack the deck at Jesus only chance for retribution: the popular vote. By urging the crowd to cry for Barabas, thus leading the Imperial government to fear a revolt if he (the Roman pilot of Judea aka Pilate)ordered otherwise, Jesus life was lost.

Don't let this happen in the next Presidential Election.

Vote for you-know-who

(Please add 2 cents to my bar/blog tab)
http://www.rentacrowd.com

 

Post a Comment

<< Home


Go here for free counters, bitches